How many words must we have? Threshold crossing into an academic disciplinary voice in the UAE

Authors

  • Michelle Bedeker Nazarbayev University
  • Amina Gaye Amadou Mahtar Mbow University

Keywords:

Disciplinary literacies, Systemic Functional Linguistics, English for Specific Contexts, Threshold concepts, Genrebased pedagogy

Abstract

When students enter higher education, they are confronted with making sense of content but also of the ways that language functions as a meaning-making resource to transmit disciplinary knowledge. In most university contexts, a growing body of research calls for a shift from general skilled-based literacies towards an explicit focus on subject disciplines and their associated epistemological literacies (Hyland, 2017; Tribble, 2017). In this paper, we argue that academic success requires that students cross Threshold Concepts (TC), which are the 'conceptual gateways or portals that lead to a previously inaccessible and initially perhaps troublesome way of thinking about something' (Meyer & Land, 2005, p.373). When English as Medium of Instruction (EMI) is a foreign language for students, it becomes imperative to develop their metalanguage or to assist them in crossing threshold concepts because they are "learning a language, learning through language, learning about language" (Halliday, 1993, p. 113). In the United Arab Emirates (UAE), health sciences' students' English language proficiency is consistently under pressure when writing assignments and tests. Thus, they are often framed in deficit discourses associated with being underachievers, unmotivated, or lacking an academic voice. This paper addresses this issue and focuses on low-proficiency EFL students who displayed little motivation when entering a compulsory one-year General Requirements Department (GRD) program. As a result, this paper highlights how two lecturers, one specializing in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and the other in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) genre-based pedagogies inducted Emirati health sciences into academic writing discourses associated with their career programs.

 

Author Biographies

Michelle Bedeker, Nazarbayev University

Dr. Michelle Bedeker works as an assistant professor at Nazarbayev University in Kazakhstan. She offers courses in the MA in Multilingual Education Program and her research interests include academic writing across school and higher education contexts, multilingual pedagogies and assessment, and early language and literacy development.

Amina Gaye, Amadou Mahtar Mbow University

Dr. Amina Gaye works as a lecturer at Amadou Mahtar Mbow University in Senegal. She is a Fulbright Scholar and a member of the International ESP Teachers' Association. Her research areas include Academic Writing, Computational Linguistics, Curriculum Design, and ESP secondary and university teacher training in STEM.

References

Akhtar, R. (2020). The effects of ESL students' attitude on academic writing apprehensions and

academic writing challenges. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5),

–5412. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i5/pr2020247

Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Alqasham, F. H. (2020). EFL writing tasks and the application of the

concept of situatedness: Evaluating the theoretical and practical aspects of the Saudi EFL

context. TESOL International, 15(4), 167- 190.

Belhiah, H., & Elhami, M. (2015). English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When

students and teachers speak. Language Policy, 14(1), 3-23.

Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control, and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique.

UK: Taylor and Francis.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York:

Longman.

Boughey, C. (2005). 'Epistemological' access to the university: an alternative perspective. South

African journal of higher education, 19(3), 230-242.

Brisk, M. (2015). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based Pedagogy for K-5

classrooms. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.12.003.

Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre: A systematic analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. (2014). Language, teaching, and learning: General

orientations. Language Learning, 64, 1-10.

Cowart, M. R. (2010). A preliminary framework for isolating and teaching threshold concepts in

philosophy. In Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp. 131-145).

Netherlands: Brill Sense.

Cowley-Haselden, S. and Monbec, L. (2019). Emancipating ourselves from mental slavery:

Affording knowledge in our practice. Available from:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335699805 [accessed Apr 11 2021].

Crusan, D. et al. (2016). Writing assessment literacy: Surveying second language teachers'

knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Assessing Writing, 28, 43-56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.03.001

Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating Identities: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society.

California: California Association for Bilingual Education.

De Santo, D., & Harrington, S. (2017). Harnessing the Intersections of Writing and Information

Literacy. At the Helm: Leading Transformation, 275-282.

Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J. (2016). Genre Pedagogy in Higher

Education: The SLATE Project. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based

genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138-154.

Ebron Jr, G. P., & Mabuan, R. A. Flipped Learning Approach in Teaching Writing in a

University Setting: Students' Experiences, Preferences, and Perspectives. TESOL

International Journal, 16(4.4), 161- 183.

Fluk, L. R. (2015). Foregrounding the research log in information literacy instruction. The

Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(4), 488-498.

Fooks, I., & Mohd, A. R (2018). Using Computer Analysis of Student Writing to Improve

Lesson Planning. Asian EFL Journal. 20(12.3), 44-65.

Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to

school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 45-55.

Doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.007.

Green, B. (Ed.). (1993). Curriculum, technology, and textual practice. Australia: Deakin

University.

Hall, G. (2011). Exploring English Language Teaching: Language in Action. New York:

Routledge.

Hall, J. K., Cheng A., & Carlson, M.T. (2006). Reconceptualizing Multicompetence as a Theory

of Language Knowledge. Applied Linguistics 27(2), 220_240.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a Social Semiotic: the social interpretation of language

and meaning. UK: Edward Arnold.

Harman, R.M. (Ed). (2018). Bilingual learners and Social Equity. Educational Linguistics 33.

DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60953-9_1

Humphrey, S. & Feez, S. (2014). Direct Instruction and the Use of Metalanguage in the

Teaching of Creative Writing. Australia: Australian Catholic University.

Hyland, K. (2017). English in the disciplines: Arguments for specificity. ESP Today, 5(1), 5- 23.

https://doi.org/10.18485/.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in

academic writing. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now?. English for specific

purposes, 21(4), 385-395.

Kelly R. & Crainton P. (2009). Transformative Learning: Q&A with Patricia Cranton. Faculty

Focus.http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/instructional-design/transformative-learning-qawith-patricia-cranton/.

Ligawen, S., & Videz, R.B. (2021). Enhancing Writing Skills through Online Publishing. TESOL

International, 16(6.1), 30- 34.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.

Vancouver: Continuum.

Maton, K., Hood, S. & Shay, S. (eds.) (2015). Knowledge Building: Educational Studies in

Legitimation Code Theory. New York: Routledge

McLaren, (2011). English Medium in the United Arab Emirates: Serving Local or Global Needs?

McKenna, S. (2010). Cracking the code of academic literacy: An ideological task. Beyond the

university gates: Provision of extended curriculum programmes in South Africa, (pp. 8-

. Bellville: CPUT.

Meyer, J.H.F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2):

Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning. Higher Education, 49, (3), 373-388. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25068074

Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold

concepts and troublesome knowledge. New York: Routledge.

Morrow, W. (2003). Epistemic values in curriculum transformation. A tale of three countries:

Social sciences curriculum transformations in Southern Africa. Bellville: Juta & Co (Pty)

Ltd.

Morrow, W. (2007). Learning to Teach in South Africa. Cape Town: HSRC Press.

Nicola-Richmond, K., Pépin, G., Larkin, H., & Taylor, C. (2018) Threshold concepts in higher

education: a synthesis of the literature relating to measurement of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 101-114.

DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1339181

Porter, B. (2014). Designing a library information literacy program using threshold concepts,

student learning theory, and millennial research in the development of information literacy sessions. Internet reference services quarterly, 19(3-4), 233-244.

Roberts, L. (2017). Research in the real world: Improving adult learners' web search and

evaluation skills through motivational design and problem-based learning. College &

Research Libraries, 78(4), 527.

Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3),

-49.

Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Genres and text: Living in the real world. Indonesian Journal of

Systemic Functional Linguistics, 1(1), 1-21.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The Role of Metalanguage in Supporting Academic Language

Development. Language Learning 63, 153-170. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x

Seeber, K. (2014). How It Got Here: Teaching 'Format as Process' in an Era of Web-Scale

Discovery.

Shanahan, M. P., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2006). The troublesome nature of a threshold concept in

Economics. In J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land (Eds), Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, (pp. 100-114). New York: Routledge.

Sidman-Taveau, R., & Karathanos-Aguilar, K. (2015). Academic Writing for Graduate-Level

English as a Second Language Students: Experiences in Education. CATESOL

Journal, 27(1), 27-52. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1111748.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. UK: Cambridge

University Press.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. UK: Cambridge

University Press.

Tamayo, R. A. (2018). Spoken Discourse Analysis on Language Use Along Turn-Taking and

Topic Management in English as Second Language (ESL) Classrooms. The Asian EFL

Journal Quarterly, 20(12.3), 8-24.

Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. United States: Parlor Press.

Tribble, C. (2017). ELFA vs. Genre: A new paradigm war in EAP writing instruction? Journal of

English for Academic Purposes, 25, 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.003

Troudi, S. (2009). The effects of English as a medium of instruction on Arabic as a language of

science and academia. Power in the EFL classroom: Critical pedagogy in the Middle

East, (pp. 199-216). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). Extracts from thought and language, and mind in society. Language,

literacy, and learning in educational practice. (pp. 45-58). UK: Multilingual Matters

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles