Exploring the Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching on Students’ Analytical Writing

Authors

  • Kam Yin Wu Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Keywords:

analytical writing, task-based language teaching, ethical case analysis, genre

Abstract

Although analysis is an essential skill for academic success, many students find it difficult to write analytically. Some resources exist that explain the features of an analytical text, but few resources have been translated into materials that teachers can use straightaway in the classroom, making their evaluation an underexplored area. This classroom-based study aimed to answer a research question: To what extent is task-based language teaching of analytical reports reflected in students’ assignments? Six units of task-based teaching materials were developed for an undergraduate technical communication course, which was taught to an intact class of 18 engineering students. The students then wrote an individual report analyzing a real world engineering ethical case. All the assignments were collected and analyzed, drawing on a genre analysis framework that examines macro level features (e.g. generic structure) and micro level features (e.g. vocabulary and grammar). Results show that the classroom instruction and materials had a positive impact on students’ performance. Most of them were able to structure their reports effectively, using the essential moves and steps and incorporating key lexical items (e.g. vocabulary of causation) and grammatical features (e.g. conditional sentences). A few students did not follow the template, choosing to take the notion of genre more flexibly. Teaching implications are explained.

Author Biography

Kam Yin Wu, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Kam Yin Wu works in the Centre for Language Education, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He teaches ESP courses to engineering students and lectures on the MA in International Language Education programme. His main interests are academic writing, genre analysis and pedagogical grammar.
Email: lckywu@ust.hk

References

Anthony, L. (2017). AntConc (3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Bazerman, C. (2015). Involved: Writing for college, writing for yourself. The WAC Clearinghouse. Fort Collins, CO. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/practice/involved.

Devereux, L., Wilson, K., Kileyc, A., & Gunawardenad, M. (2018). The proof of the pudding … analysing student written texts for evidence of a successful literacy intervention. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 12(1), A239-A253.

Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 19-45.

Hardy, J.A., & Römer, U. (2013). Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus. Corpora, 8(2), 183–207.

Hu, G. (2007). Developing an EAP writing course for Chinese ESL students. RELC Journal, 38 (1), 67-86.

Kakh, S.Y., and Manson, W.F.A.W. (2014). Task-based writing instruction to enhance graduate students’ audience awareness. Procediaes, 118, 206–213.

Learning Centre, University of Sydney. (2000). Analytical writing. Retrieved from https://sydney.edu.au/stuserv/documents/learning_centre/AnalyticalWriting.doc

Learning Centre, University of Sydney. (2014). Reading, writing or thinking more analytically or critically. Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/stuserv/learning_centre/help/analysing/analysing.shtml

Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.

Molinari, J. (2012). The EAP writing process: Exploring ontology, methodology and assessment. In Task based learning applied (pp. 14-25). Nottingham: Nottingham Jubilee Press. Retrieved from https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/education/documents/research/jubilee-press/task-based-learning.pdf

Nesi, H., and Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.

Stempel, A.R. (2010). Analytical writing in the content areas. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/39749#book

Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tardy, C.M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

University of Warwick. (2017). Writing the body of an assignment. Section: Analysis vs description: a basic distinction. Retrieved from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/globalpad/openhouse/academicenglishskills/writing/body/

Wang, W. (2018). Researching learning and learners in genre-based academic writing instruction. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.

Willis, D., & Willis, J.R. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Worden, D. (2018). Balancing stability and flexibility in genre-based writing instruction: A case study of a novice L2 writing teacher. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, pp. 44–57.

Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111–133.

International Journal of English for Specific Purposes Vol. 1 Issue 1 November 2021

Yin, B. (2016). An exploratory genre analysis of three graduate degree research proposals in applied linguistics. Functional Linguistics, 3(1), 1-28.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-12

Issue

Section

Articles