Indonesian English Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning and Teaching Materials based upon the Notion of English as International Language
Keywords:
English as International Language (EIL), EIL-based materials, English teachers, English varietiesAbstract
This study investigates the attitude of teachers who are aware of the growing concept of English as an International Language (EIL) towards the EIL-based learning and teaching materials and exploring the notion of EIL awareness at a practical teaching level. Specifically, this study discusses Indonesian English teachers’ attitudes towards EIL-based teaching materials and their reasons. This study used a survey design to investigate teachers’ perceptions of EIL-based materials. Participants were asked to listen to a specific teaching resource presented in various international English language accents and to indicate their teaching preferences and reasoning for these preferences. The findings suggested that the native speaker (NS)-based teaching materials were generally still preferred over the EIL-based one; however, evidence of openness towards EIL varieties to be used in teaching was also detected. Furthermore, the principal reasons for using or not using the EIL-based materials are associated with the intelligibility and awareness of EIL itself, although the nature of intelligibility in material development was more complex. Finally, these findings offer related implications, such as introducing curricular interventions conceptualizing EIL in English language teacher training programs.
References
Bolton, K. (2012). World Englishes and Asian Englishes: A survey of the field. In A. Kirkpatrick & R. Sussex (Eds.), English as an international language in Asia: Implications for language education (pp. 13-26). New York: Springer.
Bozoglan, H., & Gok, D. (2017). Effect of mobile-assisted dialect awareness training on the dialect attitudes of prospective English language teachers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 38(9), 772-787. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2016.1260572
Breen, M. P., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 470-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.470
Canagarajah. A., & Said, S. B. (2010). English language teaching in the outer and expanding circles. In J. Maybin, J., & J. Swann (Eds.), The Routledge companion to English language studies (pp. 157-170). London: Routledge.
Canagarajah, A., & Wurr, A. (2011). Multilingual communication and language acquisition: New research directions. The Reading Matrix, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/january_2011/canagarajah_wurr.pdf%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/5C732B07-A001-45F7-AF2E-996361E081C5
Chaipuapae, P. (2019). Insights into the effects of accents on English Listening Comprehension. Asian EFL Journal, 23(4.1), 30-52.
Chan, J. Y. H. (2013). Contextual variation and Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 32(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12004
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Creswell, J. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. United States: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Derwing, T. (2010). What do ESL students say about their accents? Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation Teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486
Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, L.L.C.
Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Furqan, A., & Rahman, A. A. (2019). The analysis of native and non-native EFL teachers in Indonesia: A review of literature. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3.4), 316-333.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next? London: British Council.
He, D., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Native speaker norms and China English: From the perspective of learners and teachers in China. TESOL Quarterly, 44(4), 769–789. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.235995
Kachru, B. B. (1992). World Englishes: Approaches, issues and resources. Language Teaching, 25(1), 1-14.
Kang, O. (2015). Learners’ perceptions toward pronunciation instruction in Three circles of World Englishes. TESOL Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.146
Kaur, P. (2014). Accent attitudes: Reactions to English as a Lingua Franca. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.218
Lee, J. S., Lee, K., & Drajati, N.A. (2019). Preservice English teachers’ perceptions of English as an international language in Indonesia and Korea. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(3), 230-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1503669
Lotfie, M. M., Wulandari, D. F. & Nurhamidah, I. (2017). Past-time marker –ed in the speech and written work of Indonesian English majors. The Journal of English as an International Language, 12(2), 56-72.
Marlina, R. (2014). The pedagogy of English as an International Language (EIL): More reflections and dialogues. In R. Marlina & R. A. Giri (Eds), The pedagogy of English as an International Language (pp. 1–19). Cham: Springer.
Matsuda, A. (2012). Teaching material in EIL. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. McKay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 168-185). New York: Routledge.
Matsuda, A., (2018). Is teaching English as an international language all about being politically correct?. RELC Journal, 49(1), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217753489
McGee, K. (2009). Attitudes towards accents of English at the British Council, Penang: What do the students want? Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 5, 162-205.
McKay, S. L. (2018). English as an International language: What it is and what it means for pedagogy. RELC Journal, 49(1), 9-23.
McKay, S. L. & Brown, J. D. (2016). Teaching and assessing EIL in local contexts around the world. New York: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, USA: Jossey Bass.
Morrison, R., & White, M. (2005). Nurturing global listeners: increasing familiarity and appreciation for world Englishes. World Englishes, 24(3), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0083-2919.2005.00417.
Mozaheb, A. A. & Monfared, A (2020). Attitudes towards pronunciation issues in three Kachruvian Circles. The Journal of English as an International Language, 15(2), 27-51.
Munro, M., Derwing, T., & Morton, S. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 11-131.
Murphy, J. M. (2014). Intelligible, comprehensible, non-native models in ESL/EFL pronunciation teaching. System, 42, 258-269.
Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.
Nguyen, M. (2017). TESOL teachers’ engagement with the native speaker model: How does teacher education impact on their beliefs? RELC journal, 48(1), 83-98.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder.
Pan, L., & Block, D. (2011). English as a “global language” in China: An investigation into learners’ and teachers’ language beliefs. System, 39(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.011
Qiong, H. X. (2004). Why China English should stand alongside British, American, and the other “world Englishes.” English Today, 20(2), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078404002056
Ranta, E. (2010). English in the real world vs. English at school: Finnish English teachers’ and students’ views. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00235
Ren, W., Chen, Y., & Lin, C.-Y. (2016). University students’ perceptions of ELF in mainland China and Taiwan. System, 56, 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.004
Rose, H., & Montakantiwong, A. (2018). A tale of two teachers: A duoethnography of the realistic and idealistic successes and failures of teaching English as an international language. RELC Journal, 49(1), 88-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217746206
Sung, C. C. M. (2016). Does accent matter? Investigating the relationship between accent and identity in English as a lingua franca communication. System, 60, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.002
Suntornsawet, J. (2019). Problematic phonological features of foreign accented English pronunciation as threats to international intelligibility: Thai EIL pronunciation core. The Journal of English as an International Language, 14(2), 72-93.
Suzuki, A. (2011). Introducing diversity of English into ELT: student teachers’ responses. ELT Journal, 65(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq024
Timmis, I. (2002). Native-speaker norms and International English: a classroom view. ELT Journal, 56(3), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.3.240
Wang, Y. (2013). Non-conformity to ENL norms: a perspective from Chinese English users. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(2), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2013-0015
Wang, W. (2015). Teaching English as an international language in China: Investigating university teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards China English. System, 53, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.06.008
Xiaoqiong, B. H., & Xianxing, J. (2011). Kachru’s three concentric circles and English teaching fallacies in EFL and ESL contexts. Changing English, 18(2), 219-228.
Yano, Y. (2001). World Englishes in 2000 and beyond. World Englishes, 20(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00204
Yeh, A. (2019). Problematizing the commodification of ESL teaching in the Philippines: Mediating expectations, norms and identity(ies). The Journal of English as an International Language, 14(1), 92-118.
Young, T. J., & Walsh, S. (2010). Which English? Whose English? An investigation of “non-native” teachers’ beliefs about target varieties. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908311003797627
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 English as International Language Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.