EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Learner Autonomy in Online Instruction during the Lockdown Period

Authors

  • Aslıhan Tuğçe Güler Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University
  • Metin Esen Sabancı University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56498/802562021

Keywords:

English language learning, learner autonomy, self-directed learning, lockdown, pandemic, online instruction

Abstract

Teaching English has been one of the subjects deeply affected by the lockdown and physical isolation period caused by COVID-19, and schools around the world had to switch to online instruction at short notice. Students engaged in this distance learning process with different autonomy levels; some adapted to the new learning system easily, while others felt lost and depended solely on what the teachers said. This descriptive study aims to discover the perception of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers on learner autonomy levels of Turkish EFL learners during online instruction throughout the lockdown period; what the biggest barriers that blocked their students’ autonomous study habits were; and what strategies teachers/ instructors followed to enhance the students’ autonomy levels. In order to analyse the data collected through an online questionnaire from 66 teacher participants, a descriptive study design with a mixed method approach was adopted. Correlational analysis was performed on the quantitative data, and qualitative data was open coded with content analysis. Findings showed that Turkish EFL learners were perceived to be autonomous at a rate of 55% by their teachers during the online instruction period, and self-access materials, technology, motivation, and the affective factors played a significant role in the development, degree, and perception of autonomy in online learning.

Author Biographies

Aslıhan Tuğçe Güler, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University

Aslıhan Tuğçe Güler, holds an MA in Curriculum & Instruction from İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University, & currently works as an English instructor at Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University in Turkey. Her interests include learner autonomy, motivation in learning and language acquisition.  She may be contacted at aslitugceguler@gmail.com.

Metin Esen, Sabancı University

Metin Esen is an Instructor of English at Sabancı University, School of Languages, İstanbul, Turkey. He holds an M.A. in Curriculum and Instruction from Bilkent University, Ankara, and DELTA Level 7 Diploma by Cambridge University Assessment. He is also doing a PhD in English Language Teaching at Middle East Technical University. His interests are teaching English as a foreign language, English for academic purposes, professional development, teacher training, advising in language learning, and technology in language education. He may be contacted at metin.esen@sabanciuniv.edu.

References

Bahari, A. (2020, September). CANDA: Computer-assisted non-linear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805774

Barnett, L., & Jordan, G. (1991). Self-access facilities: What are they for? ELT Journal, 45(4), 305–12.

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Benson, P. (2011a). What’s new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15–18.

Benson, P. (2011b). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Bishop, G. (2006), True independent learning-an andragogical approach: giving control to the learner over choice of material and design of the study session. Language Learning Journal, 33(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730685200091

Byrd Clark, J., & Dervin, F. (Eds.). (2014). Reflexivity in language and intercultural education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315879604

Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934

Collins, H. (2008). Distance learning, autonomy development and language: discussing possible connections. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 24, 529–550.

Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Authentik.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6

DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of factor analysis. Retrieved 29 November 2020 from http://www.stat-help.com/notes.html

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Pearson Education Limited.

Everhard, C. J. (2015). The assessment-autonomy relationship. In C. J. Everhard & L. Murphy (Eds.), Assessment and autonomy in language learning (pp. 8–34). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Grow, G. O. (1996). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3),125–149.

Hew, T. S., & Kadir, S. L. S. A. (2016). Predicting the acceptance of cloud-based virtual learning environment: The roles of Self Determination and Channel Expansion Theory. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 990-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.01.004

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Pergamon. (First published 1979, Strasbourg: Council of Europe).

Howlett, G. (2019). How Thai students use mobile devices when learning EFL and the effect of urban/rural school location. Asian EFL Journal, 23(6), 96–114.

Hurd, S. (2008). Affect and strategy use in independent language learning. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 218–236). Multilingual Matters.

Kim, S. H. (2014). Developing autonomous learning for oral proficiency using digital storytelling. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 20–35. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44364

Lamb, T. E. (2017). Knowledge about language and learning autonomy. In J. Cernoz & D. Gorter (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism: Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 173–186). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_14

Lee, I. (1998). Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal, 52(4), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.4.282

Lee, J. H. (2018). The effects of short terms study abroad on L2 anxiety, international posture, and L2 willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(8), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1435666

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.

Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6

Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt040.0

Murphy, M. P. A. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency e-learning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749

Najeeb, S. S. R. (2012). Learner autonomy in language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 70, 1238–1242.

Nemetz, P. L., Eager, W. M., & Limpaphayom, W. (2017). Comparative effectiveness and student choice online and face-to-face classwork. Journal of Education for Business 92(5), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1331990

Nielson, K. B. (2011). Self-study with language learning software in the workplace: What happens? Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 110–129. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44265

Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44466

Rekkedal, T., & Dye, A. (2007). Mobile distance learning with PDAs: Development and testing of pedagogical and system solutions for supporting mobile distance learners. Interactional Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.349

Ribbe, E., & Bezanilla, M.J. (2013). Scaffolding learner autonomy in online university courses. Digital Education Review, 24(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2013.24.98-112

Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). University of Rochester Press.

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1851. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947

Tsai, Y. (2019). Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: Perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650779

Turloiu, A., & Stefansdottir, I. S. (2011). Learner autonomy: Theoretical and practical information for language teachers. Reykjavik: University of Iceland.

Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001

Vankeenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4

Wang, M., Shen, R., Novak, D., & Pan, X. (2009). The impact of mobile learning on students’ behaviours and performance: Report from a large blended classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00846.x

Warschauer, M. (2010). Digital divide. In M. Bates & M. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed.), (pp. 1551–1556). CRC Press.

Watkins, S. (2019). Learners’ perceptions of benefits in a self-directed tele tandem course: An approach to encourage EFL learners to use English outside the classroom. Asian EFL Journal, 23(4), 4–29.

Zhong, Q. M. (2018). The evolution of learner autonomy in online environments: A case study in a New Zealand context. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 9(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.37237/090106

Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and after COVID-19: Immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research and practice. Springer-Verlag Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-06

How to Cite

Aslıhan Tuğçe Güler, & Metin Esen. (2021). EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Learner Autonomy in Online Instruction during the Lockdown Period. English As a Foreign Language International Journal, 1(3), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.56498/802562021

Issue

Section

Articles