EFL Teaching and Learning via Zoom during COVID-19: Impacts of Students’ Engagement on Vocabulary Range and Reading Comprehension Skills

Authors

  • Tien Thinh Vu International University, VNU-HCM
  • Diem Bich Huyen Bui International University, VNU-HCM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56498/71122021

Keywords:

reading comprehension, student’s engagement, vocabulary, zoom platform

Abstract

The social distancing policy by nearly 200 countries and territories (Le et al., 2020) due to the quick widespread of the COVID-19 Pandemic triggered the online learning mode via various platforms, including Zoom, MS Teams, Google Meets or Hangouts. This change left many teachers and stakeholders concerns about creating and maintaining a virtual but dynamic and engaging EFL learning environment. Since the size of vocabulary and reading comprehension play an important role in acquiring other skills in English learning (Amirzai, 2021; Hartshorn et al., 2017), this study aimed to investigate the impacts of EFL students’ engagement when studying reading online through Zoom on the performance of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Forty-four intermediate-level students at a public university in Vietnam were placed into a control group and an experimental group based on the results of a pre-test. While students in the control group followed the traditional format with the teacher-centred mode, those in the experimental group experienced the student-centred mode with frequent use of breakout rooms for pair work, group work and screen sharing for giving answers, elaborating on explanations and hosting vocabulary activities. After ten weeks, all the participants were required to take the post-test and particularly those in the experimental group were asked to complete a questionnaire on their attitudes towards this new learning style. Descriptive statistics of the post-test scores indicated that the experimental students outperformed the control students in vocabulary and reading comprehension. Findings from the questionnaire revealed overall satisfaction towards this learning style, and more interestingly, there appeared a correlation between students’ attitudes and the post-test scores.

Author Biographies

Tien Thinh Vu, International University, VNU-HCM

Tien Thinh Vu is head of the Testing board, coordinator of the ELT provision and vice-chair of the Department of English, International University, VNU-HCM. His current research interests include applied methodologies, autonomy development and TELL. 

Diem Bich Huyen Bui, International University, VNU-HCM

Diem Bich Huyen Bui is currently a full-time lecturer and student affairs associate of the Department of English, International University, VNU-HCM. Her research interests include teaching methodologies, skills development, technology enhances language learning, autonomy development and peer & self-assessment.

References

Amirzai, G. A. (2021). Assessing the effects of teaching vocabulary in developing receptive skills: A review article. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 3(3), 15-21.

Balinon, R. P., & Batang, B. L. (2020). Effects of teaching strategies on reading comprehension development. The Asian EFL Journal, 27(3.1), 221-252.

Cartwright, K. B., Lee, S. A., Taboada Barber, A., DeWyngaert, L. U., Lane, A. B., & Singleton, T. (2020). Contributions of executive function and cognitive intrinsic motivation to university students’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 345-369.

Cho, M. H., & Cho, Y. (2017). Self-regulation in three types of online interaction: A scale development. Distance Education, 38(1), 70-83.

Davis, N. L., Gough, M., & Taylor, L. L. (2019). Online teaching: Advantages, obstacles and tools for getting it right. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 19(3), 256-263.

Fresen, J. W. (2018). Embracing distance education in a blended learning model: Challenges and prospects. Distance education, 39(2), 224-240.

Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98-119.

Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Egbert, J., & Johnson, A. (2017). Discipline-specific reading expectation and challenges for ESL learners in US universities. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29(1), 36-60.

Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002

Kingsley, T. L., & Grabner‐Hagen, M. M. (2018). Vocabulary by gamification. The Reading Teacher, 71(5), 545-555.

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16-39.

Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E., & Donnelly, H. (2019). Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 539-560.

Lai, C. H., Lin, H. W., Lin, R. M., & Tho, P. D. (2019). Effect of peer interaction among online learning community on learning engagement and achievement. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(1), 66-77.

Lancaster, R. W. (2017). A comparison of student-centered and teacher-centered learning approaches in one alternative learning classroom environment. Parkway: Arkansas State University.

Lak, M., Soleimani, H., & Parvaneh, F. (2017). The effect of teacher-centeredness method vs. learner-centeredness method on reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1-10.

Le, N. K., Le, A. V., Brooks, J. P., Khetpal, S., Liauw, D., Izurieta, R., & Reina Ortiz, M. (2020). Impact of government-imposed social distancing measures on COVID-19 morbidity and mortality around the world. Bull World Health Organ, 10, 1-20.

Lynch, D. N. (2010). Student-centered learning: The approach that better benefits students. West Virginia: Virginia Wesleyan College.

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222.

Newmann, F. M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

Obniala, F. P. (2019). Enhancing science vocabulary through active learning approach: Impact to students’ performance. Journal of Humanities and Education Development (JHED), 1(3), 88-96.

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28-36.

Tsai, Y. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Digital game-based second-language vocabulary learning and conditions of research designs: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education, 125, 345-357.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-22

How to Cite

Tien Thinh Vu, & Diem Bich Huyen Bui. (2021). EFL Teaching and Learning via Zoom during COVID-19: Impacts of Students’ Engagement on Vocabulary Range and Reading Comprehension Skills. English As a Foreign Language International Journal, 1(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.56498/71122021

Issue

Section

Articles