Strengthening the Social Element of Reading: Facilitating Conjunctions of Readers

Authors

  • George M. Jacobs Kampung Senang Charity and Education Foundation
  • Meng Huat Chau Universiti Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56498/31202145

Keywords:

extensive reading, cooperative learning, reading as social activity, integrating extensive reading and cooperative learning, Social Constructivism

Abstract

When most people picture reading, they picture someone sitting alone holding a book or a screen of some type, such as a smartphone or tablet. In other words, reading is not seen as a social activity. Just the opposite, reading can be seen as an anti-social act; instead of talking with others, people go off alone to read, maybe even as a means of escape. However, reading is inherently a social activity. It represents an interaction between writers and readers. Writers attempt to put their ideas into words and maybe images, too. Readers develop their own interpretations of what the writers wrote, and they connect these interpretations to their own lives and thoughts. In this article, we propose that extensive reading, which involves students doing large quantities of reading, be combined with cooperative learning as an important way to strengthen the existing social nature of reading. We discuss supporting theories, research, and principles of extensive reading and cooperative learning, before providing and illustrating ideas on how to integrate extensive reading and cooperative learning in the classroom. We hope that the examples provided, based on knowledge of principles from cooperative learning and extensive reading, will inspire and sustain teachers’ efforts to strengthen the social element of their students’ reading, thereby making reading a more beneficial and enjoyable activity for their students that may continue for the rest of their lives.

Author Biographies

George M. Jacobs, Kampung Senang Charity and Education Foundation

Dr. George M. JACOBS has published and taught widely on student-centered learning, environmental education, the shift toward a post-positivist paradigm, and activism for animals. Currently, he is co-editing Being a Community Engaged Educator for Springer. He has served on the boards of local and international organizations in the Education and Charity sectors, including Extensive Reading Foundation, International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education, International Ecolinguistics Association, International Vegetarian Union, Centre for a Responsible Future, and Kampung Senang Charity and Education Foundation. George’s current research and publication projects involve B12 fortification of foods, memoir writing by seniors, the role of English as a Foreign Language in meritocracy, the use of the relative pronoun “who” to refer to nonhuman animals, conservation of aquatic animals, and community gardens. (email: george.jacobs@gmail.com)

Meng Huat Chau, Universiti Malaya

Dr. Meng Huat CHAU is Senior Lecturer at Universiti Malaya (UM), where he teaches and mentors students conducting research in Applied Linguistics. Before joining UM to take up a fellowship in 2010, he spent over ten years working with students, teachers, and teacher educators from primary and secondary schools as well as from other universities. He is currently Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Modern Languages (see https://jml.um.edu.my/). He also holds adjunct and visiting appointments at Guangdong University of Foreign Studies and De La Salle University-Dasmariñas. Meng Huat’s main areas of research are corpus linguistics and educational linguistics, spanning learner corpus research, Second Language Acquisition, Global Englishes, multilingualism, and language education with a focus on agency, feedback, and student engagement. His more recent research and writing consider the contribution of Applied Linguistics to a better, more sustainable world. (email: chaumenghuat@yahoo.co.uk)

References

Abramczyk, A., & Jurkowski, S. (2020). Cooperative learning as an evidence-based teaching strategy: What teachers know, believe, and how they use it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 296-308.

Berkman, E. T., & Wilson, S. M. (2021). So useful as a good theory? The practicality crisis in (social) psychological theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620969650

Chau, M. H., & Kerry, T. (Eds.). (2008). International perspectives on education. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Chen, R. (2021). A review of cooperative learning in EFL Classroom. Asian Pendidikan, 1(1), 1-9.

Cozolino, L. (2013). The social neuroscience of education: Optimizing attachment & learning in the classroom. W.W. Norton.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.

Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. The School Journal, 54, 77–80.

Dewey, J. (1929). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

Dörnyei, Z. (1997). Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. Modern Language Journal, 81, 482–493.

Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐and second‐language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 78-103.

Extensive Reading Foundation. (2021). Guide to extensive reading. https://erfoundation.org/guide/ERF_Guide.pdf

Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Santosa, M. H. (2020). Information and Communication Technology to help students create their own books the dialogic way. Beyond Words, 8(2), 78-91.

Jacobs, G. M. (2014a). Collaborative learning or cooperative learning? The name is not important; Flexibility is. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED574149

Jacobs, G. M. (2014b). Quotes on cooperative learning and education generally. https://www.academia.edu/3460176/Quotes_about_cooperative_learning_and_education_generally

Jacobs, G. M., & Chau, M. H. (2021). Two approaches for promoting student centered language learning: Cooperative learning and positive psychology. Beyond Words, 9(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v9i1.3042

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota.

Kilpatrick, W. H. (1918, September). The project method. Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Krashen, S.D. (2011). Free voluntary reading. ABC-CLIO.

Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw Hill.

Lieberman, M. (2013, October). https://erfoundation.org/guide/ERF_Guide.pdf [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNhk3owF7RQ&ab_channel=TEDxTalks

Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. D. Van Nostrand Company.

Murphey, T. (2016). Four social neuroscience on-going requisites for effective collaborative learning and the altruistic turn. TESL-EJ, 19(4). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume19/ej76/ej76a4

Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2016). Extensive reading and listening in the L2 classroom. In W. A. Renandya, & P. Handoyo (Eds.), English language teaching today (pp. 97-110). Routledge.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Merrill.

Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 241-271.

Shelton-Strong, S. J. (2012). Literature circles in ELT. ELT Journal, 66(2), 214-223.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Ed. by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman). Harvard University Press.

Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K. (2009). ‘Explain to your partner’: Teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49-70. DOI: 10.1080/03057640802701986

Willis, J. (2007). Cooperative learning is a brain turn-on. Middle School Journal, 38(4), 4-13.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

George M. Jacobs, & Meng Huat Chau. (2021). Strengthening the Social Element of Reading: Facilitating Conjunctions of Readers. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.56498/31202145

Issue

Section

Articles