English Language Programs (Pre-K to 12) impact on Social and Academic Engagements: The Case of a Philippine University

Authors

  • Camilla Vizconde University of Santo Tomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56498/412022158

Keywords:

English language program, academic engagement, social engagement, structural equation model (SEM), English as a Second Language (ESL)

Abstract

Considering the curricular changes in the Philippines caused by the shift from K to 10 to K to 12, the study determined the impact of the ESL Programs of the old curricula to the university students’ academic and social engagements in a comprehensive university. Evaluating the ESL Programs in the old curriculum would enable curriculum planners and policymakers to determine the need of language programs in the university level. In the study, the characteristics of the students were also investigated as moderators in the engagements. Eight hundred sixty-six (866) university students from various disciplines participated in the research following the framework of Fox, Cheng and Zumbo (2014). Quantitative in nature using the structural equation model (SEM) in analyzing the data, the results showed that the ESL language programs have impact on the academic and social engagements of the students with the learning outcomes as moderators. Anxiety, as one of the student characteristics, played significantly in moderating the course outcomes and the engagements. Students perceive the programs to have more impact on their academic engagement than their social engagement. Implications for the inclusion of the English language programs in the university level are upheld.

References

Author. (2006).

Bernardo, A. (2011). De-hegemonizing the hegemonized: an exploratory study on the dominion of American English in the oldest university in Asia. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(3), 7-22.

Berowa, A. (2018). Levels of language anxiety toward English: a sample from Davao del Norte. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 8(3), 118-128.

Brown, J.D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Cabigon, M. (2018). State of the English in the Philippines: should we be concerned. Retrieved in https://www.britishcouncil.ph/teach/state-english-philippines-should-we-be-concerned-2.

Civan, A. and Coskun, A. (2016). The effect of the medium of instruction language on the academic success of university students. Educational Science: Theory and Practice, 16(6), 1981-2004.

DeWaelsche, S. (2015). Critical thinking, questions and student engagement in Korean university English courses. Linguistics and Education, 32(1), 131-147.

EF English Proficiency Index. (2018) Retrieved in https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/about-epi/executive-summary/.

Flynn, D. (2014). Baccalaureate attainment of college students at 4-year institutions as a function of student engagement behaviors: social and academic student engagement behaviors matter. Higher Education, 55(1), 467-493.

Fox, J., Cheng, L. & Zumbo, B. (2014). Do they make a difference? The impact of English language programs on second language students in Canadian universities. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 57-85.

Frye, A.& Hammer, P. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide 67. Medical Teacher, 288-299.

Hu, S. & Wolniak. G. (2010). Initial evidence on the influence of college student engagement on early career earnings. Higher Education, 51(1), 750-766.

Kahu, E. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.

Karabıyık, C., (2019) The relationship between student engagement and tertiary level English language learners’ achievement. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 6(2), 281-293 http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/590.

Lawton, B., Brandon, P.R., Cicchinelli, L., &Kekahio, W. (2014). Logic models: A tool for designing and monitoring program evaluations. (REL 2014–007). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Pacific. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/ edlabs.

Lei, H., Cui, Y. & Zhou, W. (2015). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality, 46(3), 517-428.

Lucas, R., Bernardo, A. & M., Rojo-Laurilla. (2016). Amotivation in Filipino ESL learners: exploring some correlates. Porta Linguarum, 26(1), 109-119.

MacCallum, R.& Austin, J. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review Psychology, 51(1), 201-226.

Maguire, R., Egan, A., Hyland, P. & Maguire, P. (2017). Engaging students emotionally: the role of emotional intelligence in predicting cognitive and affective engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(2), 343-357.

Mamhot, A., Martin, M. & Masangya, E. (2013). A comparative study on the language anxiety of ESL and EFL learners. Philippine ESL Journal, 10(1), 200-231.

Pather, S. & Dorasamy, N. (2018). The mismatch between first-year students’ expectations and experience alongside university access and success: a South African university case study. The Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 6(1), 49-64.

Read, J. & Von Randow, J. (2013). A university post-entry English language assessment: charting the changes. International Journal of English Language Studies, 13(2), 89-110.

Sarvi, J., Munger, F. & Pillay, H. (2015). Transitions to K to 12 education systems: experiences from five countries. Philippines: Asian Development Bank.

Shchegovla, I. (2018). A cross-cultural comparison of the academic engagement of students. Russian Education & Society, 60(8–9), 665–681.

Solikhah, I. (2013). English for academic purposes: a survey on practices and challenges in the Central Universities of Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), 121-124.

Solikha, I. (2020). Revisiting EAP for Indonesian learners. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(2.2), 5-25.

Spaulding, D. (2008). Program evaluation in practice: core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Tokmak, H., Baturay, H. &Fadde, P. (2013). Applying the context, input, process, product evaluation model for evaluation, research, and redesign of an online master’s program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 273-292.

Torres-Olave, B.M. (2012). Imaginative geographies: identity, difference, and English as the language of instruction in a Mexican university program. Higher Education, 63(1), 317-335.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Vizconde, C. (2022). English Language Programs (Pre-K to 12) impact on Social and Academic Engagements: The Case of a Philippine University. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 4(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.56498/412022158

Issue

Section

Articles