Student Engagement in an EFL/SFL Speaking LMOOC during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Influence of Learners’ Social, Affective and Cognitive Dimensions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56498/72122021Keywords:
COVID-19 pandemic, engagement with the language (EWL), language massive open online course (LMOOC), online speaking interactionAbstract
It is empirically demonstrated that Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs) contribute to the development of learners’ foreign language (FL) competences. Thus, it is not surprising that these courses have experienced exponential growth over the last decade, being English as a foreign language (EFL) one of the most demanded subjects by LMOOC learners. However, LMOOCs face low learner engagement rates, which might be influenced by learners’ proximal and distal variables. The present study contributes to the understanding of learner engagement in an English as a FL (EFL) and Spanish as a FL (SFL) speaking LMOOC during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, it aims to understand to what extent learner engagement in the course varied during the pandemic emergency period. Second, it aims to identify the aspects of the course that promoted learner engagement, related to learners’ cognitive, affective and social dimensions. The research context is TandemMOOC, an EFL/SFL speaking LMOOC offered annually by the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Spain). Participants of the study were 2,585 enrolled learners in the TandemMOOC edition of 2019 or 2020. The study followed a mixed-method approach. First, data on learner participation was retrieved from the course system. Second, a post-course questionnaire with closed and open-ended items was administered to learners of the latter edition. Descriptive statistics on quantitative data and content analysis on qualitative data were carried out. Subsequent integration of findings showed that learner engagement in TandemMOOC increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and revealed that aspects of the course linked to learners’ social dimension were the most engaging ones.
References
Alamri, A., Zhongtian, S., Cristea, G., Lei, S., & Craig D. S. (2020). Is MOOC learning different for dropouts? A visually-driven, multi-granularity explanatory ML approach. In A. Coy, Y. Hayashi, M. Chang et al. (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 353-363). Berlin: Springer.
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y-J. (2016). Engagement with the language. How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209-240). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bárcena, E., & Martín-Monje, E. (2014). Introduction. Language MOOCs: An emerging field. In E. Martín-Monje & E. Bárcena (eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 1-15). Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Bárcena, E., Read, T., & Sedano, B. (2020). An approximation to inclusive language in LMOOCs based on Appraisal Theory. Open Linguistics, 6(1), 38-67.
Bax, S. (2017). MOOCs as a new technology: approaches to normalising the MOOCs experience for our learners. Paper presented at the B-MELTT: Flipping the Blend through MALL, MOOCs and BOIL – New Directions in CALL Symposium. Coventry, UK: Coventry University.
Beaven, T., Codreanu, T., & Creuzé, A. (2014). Motivation in a language MOOC: Issues for course designers. In E. Martín-Monje, & E. Bárcena (eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries (pp. 48-66). Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Beirne, E., Nic Giolla Mhichíl, M., & Ó Cleircín, G. (2017). LMOOCs, classifying design: Survey findings from LMOOC providers. In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (eds.), CALL in a Climate of Change: Adapting to Turbulent Global Conditions – Short Papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 30-34). Wuhan: Research-publishing.net.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY: Free Press.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. New York, NY: Sage Publications, Inc.
Campbell, A., McNamara, O., & Gilroy, P. (2004). Practitioner research and professional development in education. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
Chen, T., Peng, L., Jing, B., Wu, C., Yang, J., & Cong, G. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on user experience with online education platforms in China. Sustainability, 12(18), 2-31.
Cook, S., Bingham, T., Reid, S., & Wang, L. (2015). Going 'massive': Learner engagement in a MOOC environment. Paper presented at the THETA 2015 Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.
Coombs, P. H., & Ahmed, M. (1974). Attacking rural poverty: How nonformal education can help. World Bank research publication. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dewaele, J.-M. (2011). Reflections on the emotional and psychological aspects of foreign language learning and use. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 22(1), 23-42.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284.
Ferguson R. & Sharples, M. (2014). Innovative pedagogy at massive scale: Teaching and learning in MOOCs. In C. Rensing, S. de Freitas, T. Ley,P. J. Muñoz-Merino (eds.), Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. EC-TEL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8719, pp. 98-111. Berlin: Springer.
Flores-Tena, M., Ortega-Navas, M., & Sousa-Reis, C. (2021). The use of digital ICT by teachers and their adaptation to current models. Revista Electrónica Educare, 25(1), 1-21.
Frey, B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vols. 1–4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fuchs, C. (2019). The structural and dialogic aspects of Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs): A case study. In I. Management Association (eds.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 1540-1562). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
García-Peñalvo, F-J., Fidalgo-Blanco, A., & Sein-Echaluce, M-L. (2018). An adaptive hybrid MOOC model: Disrupting the MOOC concept in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1018-1030.
Hassan, M. (2017). Girl with ideas [Image]. Retrieved from https://pixabay.com
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
Kahu, E., Stephens, C.; Zepke, N. & Leach, L. (2014). Space and time to engage: Mature-aged distance students learn to fit study into their lives. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(4), 523-540.
Kan, Q., & Bax, S. (eds). (2017). Beyond the language classroom: Researching MOOCs and other innovations. Wuhan: Research-publishing.net.
Mahyoob, M. (2020). Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4), 351-362.
Martín-Monje, E. & Bárcena, E. (eds.) (2014). Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. Warsaw/Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).
Moreira Teixeira, A. & Mota, J. (2015). A proposal for the methodological design of collaborative language MOOCs. In E. Martín-Monje, & E. Bárcena(eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries (pp. 33-47). Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
O'Dowd, R. (2007). Evaluating the outcomes of online intercultural exchange, ELT Journal, 61(2), 144-152.
Pernías Peco, P. & Luján-Mora, S. (2013). Los MOOC: Orígenes, historia y tipos. Comunicación y Pedagogía. Especial MOOC, 269-270, 41-47.
Reich, J. & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC Pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130-131.
Ricart Casadevall, S., Villar Navascués, R., & Hernández, M. (2020). Aprendizaje y comportamiento del estudiantado en un curso MOOC sobre análisis geográfico de los riesgos naturales: Resultados y retos del e-learning [Learning and student behavior in a MOOC course on geographic analysis of natural hazards: Results and challenges of e-learning]. In Roig-Vila, R. (ed.), La docencia en la Enseñanza Superior. Nuevas aportaciones desde la investigación e innovación educativas (pp. 1323-1332). Barcelona: Octaedro.
Schwartz, S. (2021). COVID-19, precarity and loneliness. Analytical Psychology, 66(3), 517-533.
Sokolik, M. (2014). What constitutes an effective language MOOC. In Martín-Monje & Bárcena (eds.), Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries (pp. 16-32). Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
Sull, E. C. (2012). Teaching online with Errol: A tried and true mini-guide to engaging online students. Faculty focus special report: Online student engagement tools and strategies (pp. 6-8). Madison, WI: Magna Publications, Inc.
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 242-258.
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2012). Language awareness in language learning and teaching: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 45(3), 376-388.
Svalberg, A.M-L. (2018). Researching language engagement; current trends and future directions, Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 21–39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
